Land Injection Vs Land Conversion: Seeking the Solution to the Discontinuity of Agricultural Land Provision

Authors

  • Dwi Wulan Pujiriyani Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional
  • Endriatmo Soetarto IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31292/mj.v1i2.19

Keywords:

Land Injection, Land Conversion , Discontinuity of Agricultural Land

Abstract

Land conversion takes place more rapidly than the addition of new land. This paper attempts to investigate these two events by offering a more sensible solution to answer the need for land provision which over time continues to clash with various interests in land. The best solution to land provision is to give recognition to the ‘living space and the farming profession' by stating that the agricultural profession is the noblest profession, the most realistic profession, and constitutionally justified. They are a group of people whose profession is on going, or continuing, and it only requires political commitment as well as recognition of their living space and their profession that farmers and farming are a profession as well as a right to life. Local initiatives such as those emerging in the Kasepuhan community, the Subak tradition in Bali, and the determination of Sedulur Sikep community with their farming traditions should have earned their right not to be ‘disturbed’ but to be let live and get recognition and protection. Protecting these existing and sustainable forms of local farming initiatives is a real manifestation of the solution to the deadlock of the search for new agricultural land that faces various obstacles. Recognition should not only be given to indigenous groups as it has been done, but also to food farmer communities that have independently developed their agriculture in a sustainable manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachriadi, D., & Wiradi, G. (2011). Enam Dekade Ketimpangan: Masalah Penguasaan Tanah di Indonesia. 82.

Djoni; Suprianto; Eri Cahrial. (2016). Kajian Alih Fungsi Lahan Pertanian Pangan di Kota Tasikmalaya. Mimbar Agribisnis, 1(3), 233–244.

Geria, I. M., Sumardjo, N., Sutjahjo, S. H., Widiatmaka, N., & Kurniawan, R. (2019). Subak sebagai Benteng Konservasi Peradaban Bali. Amerta, 37(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.24832/amt.v37i1.39-54

Ikmaludin, I., Kusmana, C., & Amirudin, S. (2018). Tipologi Sistem Budidaya Pertanian Dan Keberlanjutan Ketersediaan Pangan Pada Masyarakat Adat Kasepuhan Ciptagelar Sukabumi. RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian Dan Lingkungan, 5(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.28756

Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/BPNRI. (2022). Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria 2015-2020. https://sigtora.atrbpn.go.id/

Kementerian Pertanian. (2020, January). Warta Pertanian. Volume XIII/Edisi Januari, 1–49.

Prabowo, Y. B., & Sudrajat, S. (2021). Kearifan Lokal Kasepuhan Ciptagelar: Pertanian Sebagai Simbol Budaya & Keselarasan Alam. Jurnal Adat Dan Budaya Indonesia, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.23887/jabi.v3i1.31102

Pujiriyani, D.W.; Soetarto, E.; Santosa, D.A.; Agusta, I. (2019). Deagrarianization and Local Food Security Strategy for Peasant Communities in Rural Central Java. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 11(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v11i2.20209

Pujiriyani, D. W., & Soetarto, E. (2018). The existence of agriculture and the autonomy of peasant community. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 196(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/196/1/012045

Ritung, Sofyan; Suryani, Erna; Subardja, D; Sukarman; Nugroho, Kusumo; Hikmatullah; Mulyani, Anny; Tafakresnanto, Chendy; Sulaeman, Yiyi; Subandiono, Rudi Eko; Wahyunto; Ponidi; Prasodjo, Noto; Suryana, Usep; Hidayat, Hapid; Priyono, Adi; Supriatna, W. (2015). Sumberdaya lahan pertanian indonesia: luas penyebaran dan potensi ketersediaan (in Bahasa) (D. Husen, Edi; Agus, Fahmuddin; Nursyamsi (ed.); Issue October).

Santosa, D. A. (2016). Aspek Agraris dari Usaha Mencapai Kedaulatan Pangan.

Saragih, H. (2013). Transformasi Pedesaan. In Rural Talks: Ikhtiar Memahami Transformasi Sosial-Ekonomi Masyarakat Desa. Indonesian Human Rights Committe for Social Justice.

Shohibuddin, M. (2018). Reforma agraria untuk keamanan tenurial. GATRA, January 2017, 1–5.

Soetarto, Endriatmo; Agusta, I. (2012). Arah Baru Penurunan Ketahanan Pangan: Deruralization, Depesantization, Deagrarianization.pdf. In B. Fariyanti, Anna; Rifin Amzul; Jahroh, Siti; Krisnamurthi (Ed.), Pangan Rakyat: Soal Hidup atau Mati, 60 Tahun Kemudian (pp. 449–460). Departemen Agribisnis, FEM-IPB dan PERHEPI.

Wahono, F. dkk. (2011). Ekonomi Politik Pangan: Kembali ke Basis: Dari Ketergantungan ke Kedaulatan. Bina Desa, Cinde Books.

Zakaria, A. K. B. R. (2013). Implementasi Sosialisasi Insentif Ekonomi Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Perlindungan Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan (PLP2B). Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 31(2), 139–149. http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/fae/article/view/3835/3183

Downloads

Published

2022-04-28

How to Cite

Pujiriyani, D. W., & Soetarto, E. (2022). Land Injection Vs Land Conversion: Seeking the Solution to the Discontinuity of Agricultural Land Provision . Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 1(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.31292/mj.v1i2.19