Handling Access to Agrarian Reform After Legalization of Assets in Cilacap Regency (The Relationship between Access to Agrarian Reform and Community Motivation in Utilizing Land Certificates)

Authors

  • Rizky Nauval Millenda Alumni Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional
  • Setiowati Setiowati Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31292/mj.v3i2.53

Keywords:

Agrarian Reform, Access Handling

Abstract

Agrarian Reform is a major agenda of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency mandated by TAP MPR IX/MPR/2001 concerning Agrarian Reform and Natural Resources Management. TAP MPR IX/MPR/2001 Article 2 highlights two primary facets of agrarian reform: the ownership and control (land reform) aspect and the use and utilization aspect. Asset structuring, through asset legalization, implements the ownership and control (land reform) aspect. We implement aspects of land use and utilization through access arrangement activities. We have implemented asset structuring activities intensively. On the other hand, access handling activities have not been implemented optimally. The Cilacap Regency Land Office has designated Sidamukti Village, Patimuan District, Cilacap Regency as the location for the 2022 Cilacap Regency Land Office's Agrarian Reform Access Handling activity. This activity builds on the asset structuring activities conducted through PTSL in 2021. Research on Handling Access We conducted a quantitative study using the Sperm Correlation Test following the legalization of assets in Sidamukti Village, Patimuan District, Cilacap Regency. The study's findings demonstrate that we followed the Technical Guidelines for Handling Access to Agrarian Reform in 2022 when managing access to agrarian reform. There exists a correlation between the implementation of agrarian reform access management and the community's motivation to utilize land certificates. Additionally, a correlation exists between the community's proficiency in information and production technology, specifically in entrepreneurship, and their utilization of land certificates following asset validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduh, M., Alawiyah, T., Apriansyah, G., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2023). Survey Design: Cross Sectional dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), 31-39.

Andriaty, E., Sankarto, B. S., & Setyorini, E. (2011). Kajian Kebutuhan Informasi Teknologi Pertanian Di Beberapa Kabupaten Di Jawa. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, 20(20).

Arisaputra, M. I. (2013). Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance dalam Penyelenggaraan Reforma Agraria di Indonesia. Yuridika, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i2.1881

Dempo, A. A. P., Salim, M. N., & Farid, A. H. (2021). Evaluasi pelaksanaan redistribusi tanah eks kawasan hutan di Kabupaten Musi Rawas. Tunas Agraria, 4(1), 1-21.

Fauzi, A. (2022). Reformasi Agraria dalam Kerangka Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i2.678

Frankel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th Edition). In Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Gibran, F., Pujiriyani, D. W., & Sugiasih, S. (2023). Stakeholder Analysis in the Implementation of the Agrarian Reform Program in East Lombok Regency. Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 3(1), 34-52.

Komala, R., Noor, T. I., & Yusuf, M. N. (2021). Dampak Program Reforma Agraria Terhadap Tingkat Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga Petani Di Desa Pasawahan Kecamatan Banjaranyar Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.25157/jimag.v8i2.5335

Kurniawan, A., Sudibyanung, M., & Supriyanti, T. (2020). Pemanfaatan Sertipikat Tanah Hasil Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Untuk Peningkatan Modal Usaha Di Kabupaten Madiun. Tunas Agraria, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v3i3.124

Kusumastuti, A., Khoiron, A. M., & Achmadi, T. A. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Deepublish.

Mardiana, Y. S., Siregar, H., & Juanda, B. (2016). Pengaruh Sertifikasi Tanah Terhadap Nilai Tanah dan Kondisi Ekonomi Masyarakat di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.2.3.304

Monsaputra, Munibah, K., & Panuju, D. R. (2022). Faktor Penentu Pemanfaatan Sertifikat Redistribusi Tanah untuk Mengakses Modal: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Pasaman Barat. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2022.6.1.65-73

Riyadi, A. D., Salim, N., & Mujiati, M. (2020). Pemberdayaan masyarakat pasca kegiatan ajudikasi di desa Sumogawe kecamatan Getasan kabupaten Semarang. Tunas Agraria, 3(2), 20-39.

Rohman, M. L., & Astuti, P. (2019). Access Reform Dalam Program Reforma Agraria: Studi Kasus Desa Tahunan Kecamatan Tahunan Kabupaten Jepara. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 8(4).

Salim, M. N., & Utami, W. (2020). Reforma agraria, menyelesaikan mandat konstitusi: Kebijakan reforma agraria dan perdebatan tanah objek reforma agraria. STPN Press.

Salim, M. N. (2020). Reforma Agraria: Kelembagaan dan Praktik Kebijakan (Buku Ajar).

Winarso, A., Prasetyo, P. K., & Saleh, R. D. D. (2022). Access Reform dalam Program Reforma Agraria. Tunas Agraria, 5(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/Doi: https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v5i3.191

Downloads

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Millenda, R. N., & Setiowati, S. (2024). Handling Access to Agrarian Reform After Legalization of Assets in Cilacap Regency (The Relationship between Access to Agrarian Reform and Community Motivation in Utilizing Land Certificates) . Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 3(2), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.31292/mj.v3i2.53