Collaborative Leadership in the Development of Integrated Land Data in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review

Mansur Fahmi; Nur Wening

doi:10.31292/mj.v6i1.204

Authors

Mansur Fahmi Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Manajemen, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta
Nur Wening Program Studi Doktoral Ilmu Manajemen, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31292/mj.v6i1.204

Keywords:

collaborative leadership, integrated land data, interoperability, land administration, systematic literature review

Abstract

This study examines the role of collaborative leadership in the development of integrated land data through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 31 selected scholarly articles published between 2012 and 2025. The findings indicate that the successful development of integrated land data depends not only on technological advancement but also on the capacity of cross-sectoral leadership to foster coordination, institutional interoperability, and adaptive data governance. Standards and frameworks such as the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM), Indonesia's One Map Policy, and the Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration (FFP-LA) approach provide essential foundations for supporting land data integration in Indonesia. The study's principal finding confirms that collaborative leadership serves as the primary driving force behind the development of an integrated land data system by strengthening data governance, promoting standardization, and facilitating the adoption of technological innovation. Based on these findings, the study proposes a conceptual framework that positions collaborative leadership as the entry point for aligning data governance, international standards, and technological innovation to achieve an interoperable and sustainable land data system. The study recommends strengthening collaborative governance, enhancing institutional integration, and developing human resource capacity to support a sustainable national land administration system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451

Ahsan, M. S., Hussain, E., Lemmen, C., Zevenbergen, J., Atif, S., Chipofya, M., … Koeva, M. (2025). Deriving requirements for integrated and standardised cadastre profile from the legacy Board of Revenue and the contemporary land administration systems. Survey Review, 57(401), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2024.2351624

Andreini, D., Bettinelli, C., Foss, N. J., & Mismetti, M. (2022). Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(4), 1089–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09590-w

Ansah, B. O., Voss, W., Asiama, K. O., & Wuni, I. Y. (2023). A systematic review of the institutional success factors for blockchain-based land administration. Land Use Policy, 125, 106473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106473

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Balas, M., Carrilho, J., & Lemmen, C. (2021). The fit for purpose land administration approach-connecting people, processes and technology in mozambique. Land, 10(8), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080818

Barry, M., & Roux, L. (2019). Hybrid governance and land purchase strategies in a state-subsidised housing project in a rural South African town. Survey Review, 51(369), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1482674

Biitir, S. B., Nara, B. B., & Ameyaw, S. (2017). Integrating decentralised land administration systems with traditional land governance institutions in Ghana: Policy and praxis. Land Use Policy, 68, 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.007

Chen, M., Van Oosterom, P., Kalogianni, E., Dijkstra, P., & Lemmen, C. (2024). Bridging Sustainable Development Goals and Land Administration: The Role of the ISO 19152 Land Administration Domain Model in SDG Indicator Formalization. Land, 13(4), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040491

Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938

Cristofaro, M., Augier, M., Lovallo, D., Abatecola, G., & Leoni, L. (2024). Behavioral strategy in evolution: A review and conceptual framework. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.10.002

Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003

Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power. In Harvard Business School. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=56021

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Enemark, S., Bell, K. C., Lemmen, C., & McLaren, R. (2014). Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration. Retrieved from https://fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub60/figpub60.asp

FAO. (2018). Report of the first meeting of the Parties to the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing, Oslo, Norway, 29-31 May 2017. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp. 29–31. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c02c2b05-8943-40b5-aeba-ff811c1dc750/content

Gogolou, C., & Dimopoulou, E. (2015). Land Administration Standardization for the integration of cultural heritage in land use policies. Land Use Policy, 49, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.029

Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230

Hamblin, R., Plimmer, G., Badar, K., & Lasthuizen, K. (2024). Organizational Ambidexterity: A Bibliometric Review and Framework for Future Public Administration Research. Public Performance and Management Review, 47(5), 1073–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2373178

Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open Strategy: Dimensions, Dilemmas, Dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.12.001

Hosseini, H., Atazadeh, B., & Rajabifard, A. (2025). Towards intelligent land administration systems: Research challenges, applications and prospects in AI-driven approaches. Land Use Policy, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107652

Hull, S. A. (2024). All for one and one for all? Exploring the nexus of land administration, land management and land governance. Land Use Policy, 144, 107248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107248

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. In Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203010167

International Standard Organization (ISO). (2025). ISO 19152-1: 2024, Geographic Information — Land Administration Domain Model (LADM), Part 1: Generic Conceptual Model. Www.Iso.Org. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/81263.html

Junarto, R., & Djurjani, D. (2020). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) untuk Pemetaan Kadaster. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v6i1.428

Kalogianni, E., Van Oosterom, P., Dimopoulou, E., & Lemmen, C. (2020). 3D land administration: A review and a future vision in the context of the spatial development lifecycle. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020107

Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing Data Governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, (January 2007). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302924724_Guidelines_for_performing_Systematic_Literature_Reviews_in_Software_Engineering

Križanović, J., & Roić, M. (2023). Development of a Methodology and Model for Land Administration Data Dissemination Processes. Land, 12(3), 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030711

Lemmen, C., van Oosterom, P. J. M., & Bennett, R. (2015). The Land Administration Domain Model. Land Use Policy, 49, 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.014

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Antes, G., Atkins, D., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mustofa, F. C. (2020). Evaluation of Land Information System Development in The National Land Agency. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 6(2), 158–172. Retrieved from https://jurnalbhumi.stpn.ac.id/

Mustofa, F. C., & Wahyuni, W. (2020). Infrastruktur Data Spasial Berbasis Geoportal: Implementasi Kebijakan Satu Peta. Jurnal Pertanahan, 10(1 (Juli)), 61–78.

Naghavi, M., Alesheikh, A. A., Hakimpour, F., Vahidnia, M. H., & Vafaeinejad, A. (2022). VGI-based spatial data infrastructure for land administration. Land Use Policy, 114, 105969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105969

Nugroho, T. (2023). Validity and Reliability of Cadastral Map for Complete Systematic Land Registration in Kalisari and Tlogopandogan Villages, Demak Regency, Indonesia. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 9(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v9i1.600

Nurwadjedi. (2020). Optimalisasi Implementasi Kebijakan Satu Peta Untuk Penyelesaian Konflik Penggunaan Lahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 1–12. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stialan.ac.id/index.php/jpap/article/view/236

Okembo, C., Morales, J., Lemmen, C., Zevenbergen, J., & Kuria, D. (2024). A Land Administration Data Exchange and Interoperability Framework for Kenya and Its Significance to the Sustainable Development Goals. Land, 13(4), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040435

Oukes, P., Okembo, C., Morales, J., Lemmen, C., Zevenbergen, J., & Kuria, D. (2024). Implementing data exchange and interoperability on LADM country profiles using the ISO framework for enterprise interoperability standard. Land Use Policy, 146, 107333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107333

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2011). UU 4/2011: Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 tentang Informasi Geospasial. Lembar Negara No.49/2011. Retrieved from http://www.bpn.go.id/PUBLIKASI/Peraturan-Perundangan

Pinuji, S. (2016). Integrasi Sistem Informasi Pertanahan Dan Infrastruktur Data Spasial Dalam Rangka Perwujudan One Map Policy. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 2(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v2i1.31

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2016). Perpres 9/2016: Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Satu Peta pada tingkat ketelitian Peta skala 1:50.000. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia 28/2016. Retrieved from http://www.bpn.go.id/PUBLIKASI/Peraturan-Perundangan

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2019). Perpres 39/2019: Peraturan Presiden Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia No.112/2019. Jakarta, Indonesia: LN.2019/NO.112, LL SETNEG: 35 HLM.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2021). Perpres 23/2021: Peraturan Presiden Nomor 23 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Satu Peta pada Tingkat Ketelitian Peta Skala 1:50.000. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia No.92/2021. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/164964/perpres-no-23-tahun-2021

Prindex. (2021). Measuring global perceptions of land and property rights. Retrieved from Website Prindex website: https://www.prindex.net/

Rashid, M. R. A., Rafi, A. Al, Islam, M. A., Sharkar, S. U., Rafi, Z. H., Hasan, M., … Khan, M. S. H. (2025). Enhancing land management policy in Bangladesh: A blockchain-based framework for transparent and efficient land management. Land Use Policy, 150, 107436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107436

Seidl, D., Ma, S., & Splitter, V. (2024). What makes activities strategic: Toward a new framework for strategy-as-practice research. Strategic Management Journal, 45(12), 2395–2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3668

Shahidinejad, J., Kalantari, M., & Rajabifard, A. (2024). 3D Cadastral Database Systems—A Systematic Literature Review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13010030

Shiferaw, R. M., & Amentie Kero, C. (2024). Dynamic capabilities view practices of business firms: a systematic literature review. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2336309

Silviana, A. (2019). Kebijakan Satu Peta (One Map Policy) Mencegah Konflik di Bidang Administrasi Pertanahan. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.195-205

Siswanto. (2010). Systematic Review Sebagai Metode Penelitian Untuk Mensintasis Hasil-Hasil Penelitian: Sebuah Pengantar. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 13(4), 326–333.

Sulistyawati, M. N., Aditya, T., & Santosa, P. B. (2018). The Implementation of LADM Versioned-Object Class for Representing Spatio-Temporal of Cadastre 4D Objects. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 4(2), 249–265. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i2.281

UN-GGIM. (2018). A strategic Guide to Develop and Strenghthen Nation Geospatial Information Management - Part 1: Overreaching Strategic FRamework. United Nations: Integrated Geospatial Information Framework, Vol. 1, pp. 69–88. Retrieved from https://ggim.un.org/meetings/ggim-committee/8th-session/documents/part 1-igif-overarching-strategic-framework-24july2018.pdf

UN-GGIM. (2022). United Nations Integrated Geospatial Information Framework (UN-IGIF): Part 2. Retrieved July 1, 2025, from United Nations: Integrated Geospatial Information Framework website: https://ggim.un.org/UN-IGIF/part2.cshtml

Van Oosterom, P., & Lemmen, C. (2015). The Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Motivation, standardisation, application and further development. Land Use Policy, 49, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.032

Visnjevac, N., Soskic, M., & Mihajlovic, R. (2024). Towards Quality Management Procedures in 3D Cadastre. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(5), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13050160

Vucic, N., Vranic, S., Sutherland, M., & Van Oosterom, P. (2024). Registration of apartments and office spaces in 3D land administration – A case study in Croatia. Land Use Policy, 142, 107187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107187

Wahyuningsih, S. (2024). Implementasi Kebijakan Satu Peta dalam Rangka Penyelesaian Tumpang Tindih Pemanfaatan Ruang Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ASIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 12(2), 290–309. Retrieved from https://jurnal.asian.or.id/index.php/JIANA/article/view/235

Widiyantoro, S., & Rineksi, T. W. (2024). Berbagi pakai data spasial pertanahan pada penyusunan rencana detail tata ruang. Region: Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 19(1), 347. https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v19i1.69856